See the cat? See the cradle?

“I can’t understand why so many people rank it so highly. There is no accounting for taste, I guess.”
avid reader “Emmy Lou”

“This book is absolutely horrible. Seriously, it’s hideous.”
Hemingway Hater

“If I could give negitive [sic] stars I would.”
A reader

“What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing.”
– Bokonon

Kurt Vonnegut has finally surpassed Thomas Pynchon as my favorite author, and he did it with his novel, Cat’s Cradle. Cat’s Cradle tells the story of a man named John. “Call me Jonah,” he says in the first line of the novel, “because somebody or something has compelled me to be certain places at certain times, without fail.” John is a Bokononist and he writes us his story “to include as many members of my karass as possible, and I mean to examine all strong hints as to what on Earth we, collectively, have been up to.” A karass, he explains, is what Bokonon calls a group of people who (unknowingly) work together to do God’s work. John first encountered members of his own karass while he was conducting research for a history book entitled The Day the World Ended, about the day America dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. He did not finish the book.

As I. Ujevic writes, “this is the first book in my life that I threw into the garbage.”

Cat’s Cradle is a satire, and within its pages Vonnegut charges straight at our society’s greatest institutions, including religion, American idealism, and the progress accorded to scientific research. John first pursues his research for The Day the World Ended by contacting the children of the late Felix Hoenikker, the key researcher in the development of the atomic bomb. The Hoenikker children, John realizes as he writes, and most definitely Dr. Hoenikker himself (regardless of the fact that he was dead), were part of his karass. Newt (Hoenikker’s youngest) tells John that on the day the bomb was dropped Dr. Hoenikker was frightening him with a game of cat’s cradle, a game formed by a long loop of a string, making virtually no attempt to represent a cat or a cradle. The notion of truth is Vonnegut’s biggest target for satire here. People revere Dr. Hoenikker as a hero for creating the atomic bomb, but those same people didn’t see the terrible indifference and careless irresponsibility with which he approached his family—with which he, in fact, approached all of life. Julian Castle, a philanthropist John is hired to write an article about while researching his book, turns out to be a blatant misanthrope. Even the first words in The Books of Bokonon are “All the true things that I am about to tell you are shameless lies.” Newt constantly makes reference to cat’s cradle—a game with no cat, no cradle, no meaning or value of any kind but that is nonetheless a childhood favorite. The game becomes a symbol of the characters’ (all nothing more than grown-up children) pursuit of some deeper significance for their lives—a long, drawn out game with no discernible end. Or as JP stated, “The title of the book has to do with a very minor incident and it should have been called ice-nine.”

John continues pursuing biographical information about Dr. Hoenikker when he discovers that Hoenikker, in addition to working on the atomic bomb, created a substance called ice-nine—what turns out to be a wampeter, or an object that is the center point of a karass. As Tom Newbro (or “shnowbrow”) states, “This is where the book starts to become horrible…”

John’s research eventually leads him to share a plane with two of the three Hoenikker children (now adults) as they travel to the Caribbean island of San Lorenzo, the birthplace of Bokononism and the residence of the third Hoenikker child. Bokonon also lives on the island. He and his friend, Edward McCabe, shipwrecked there and, seeing the desolate and miserable lives of the islanders, took it over, hoping to create a utopia. Bokonon created Bokononism to give whatever hope to the people a made-up religion can with its foma, or comforting but harmless untruths. Then he asked McCabe (now the political leader of the island) to exile him and outlaw Bokononism, making it more exotic and adding a deeper meaning to the islanders’ lives.

Vonnegut’s real genius rests in his ability to make us laugh about some of the scariest parts of our culture. And in the humor we are able to view our lives from a different angle, questioning the things we take for granted, the foundations upon which we build our lives. It was enough to garner A reader’s coveted “el Stinko Award,” who called it “a pointless, plotless book” that “should not be considered as any sort of literary achievement.”

John begins the book with a Bokononist warning: “Anyone unable to understand how a useful religion can be founded on lies will not understand this book.” I, however, highly recommend Cat’s Cradle to anyone able to get past that initial warning. It is a wonderful (if harrowing) look at the lives we live. It was published in 1963, with America firmly planted in Vietnam, trying as fast as it could to create more efficient ways of killing other human beings. The American Ideal of democracy was a righteous one, and anyone not wholly committed to its enemies’ destruction could easily be labeled an enemy themselves and a traitor. Now, in a post-9/11 world, America is engaged in another war for democracy—trading communists for terrorists—and any opposition to America’s righteous cause is oftentimes met with suspicion and hate. Cat’s Cradle remains as relevant today as it was when it was first published. But vincent vega said it best:

“This is a decent sci-fi escape, but nowhere near as good an escape as Star Wars: Attack of the Clones, or Star Wars: A New Hope. This isn’t very challenging, and you may feel compelled to read it because of the almost too simple story, and easy going language. This is basically a book about a mad scientist who tries to take over the world by freezing it over with a substance called Ice-Nine . . . not very complex or deep, a basic fable, but still entertaining. But as entertaining as Star Wars? NO. I recommend renting the star war movies or getting the star war books, especially the ones with Jabba the Hut. Cat’s Cradle has no point or meaning to it, unlike Lucas’s prophetic, amazing vision. Vonnegut is funny, but not very intelligent.”

A Cylon Says What

Anyone else get their world riggity-rocked by the season finale of Battlestar Galactica?

*Commence the spoilin’*

Apollo‘s shaming everyone, all but one of the humanoid Cylons have been revealed, and Galactica’s surrounded by basestars–good times! I find it a little annoying that there was no closure at the end of the season. That seems to be how this show rolls, but c’mon.

I’m gonna say the series peaked last season. I wasn’t in to this one as much as the second season. This season had less of an overall story than I would have liked. I guess it was more about the characters. Yeah, a lot happened with the characters but not a lot happened with the story (if that makes sense). I guess we’ll start at the beginning.

Neeeeew Caprica. I think they squandered that opportunity, frankly. Just when I got used to the idea of New Caprica, they left. I thought they’d spend more than four episodes there. Instead we jump four months after the Cylon occupation. Why wouldn’t they show us how the occupation began? There’d be some cool ground fighting, we could see how the resistance started, yatta yatta yatta, and we could see how things slowly spiral out of control. Tigh’s use of suicide bombers would also be more morally ambiguous, because we would have seen how brutal the Cylons were and how desperate the humans got. Instead we got a paper-thin parallel to the Iraq war. Thanks. Seriously, I thought they should have spent half the season there. It was a big decision to colonize it but it didn’t feel like the series treated it that way. The big battle to rescue everyone was pretty cool, but, again, it felt rushed. Suddenly the Pegasus is destroyed? After four episodes?

The Cylon storyline was . . . weird. A lot of it seemed like just an excuse for the writers to throw out more quasi-mystical jargon. Like with the hybrid. I wasn’t down with the heavy religious focus on the Cylons. I would have cared much more to actually see Baltar interact with more of them. Instead, we get a weird montage: ok, ok, um . . . show some lights, Baltar looks confused, ok, someone naked, more lights, what about that red eye thing of the Cylons, yeah, good, ominous, ok, back to Baltar, oh look, he’s still confused, flashing lights, gimme a voice over, make it Baltar, he doesn’t know what’s going on, talk vaguely about the Cylon God’s plan without actually saying anything, yes! Done.

That Bulldog guy came out of nowhere. That episode was kinda cool. Finding out that the humans may have been the aggressors was a neat reversal of the “Cylons are absolute evil and all they want to do is kill . . . just because.” I can get behind that. But, damn, they killed Kat in a hurry. Something must have been up with that actress because damn. It’s not like they didn’t have enough story to stretch that out over a few episodes. First you introduce the guy from the past, then you mount the pressure on Kat as his demands get more and more, then you bring it to a climax. Plus, this was, like, the only episode to focus on Kat . . . ever. Although, if it was a problem with the actress than it was out of the writers’ hands and they did what they could.

I feel like the characters of Roslin and Adama got away from the writers this season, too. They seemed to be used just to make other characters develop. Take Roslin for instance. One minute she’s the compassionate kindergarten teacher who’s thrust into these crazy circumstances and the next she’s a draconian dictator. What? And Adama. I remember one specific instance in the episode “Unfinished Business.” He literally does a 180 on his response to the boxing in a matter of minutes. One minute he and Roslin are watching the fights and he’s having a good time because it gives the crew an opportunity to let off some steam and diffuse tension between peers. Then he overhears Tyrol telling one of his deckhands that they’ll take care of something or another tomorrow because right then they were taking a break, blowing off some steam. So what’s Adama do? He challenges Tyrol to a fight—a fight he wants to lose—so he can shame everyone for trying to have a good time. Then Tyrol reaffirms his commitment to duty or whatever. What?! Makes no sense. Again, it’s Roslin and Adama as merely an instrument for other characters’ development. Did the writers forget they are characters too?

I liked the dissention in the Cylon ranks, specifically with the Threes (even if it was for an ambiguous, quasi-mystical reason). I just wanted more of it. Show me more of the Cylons being Cylons, dammit.

Then we got four straight episodes that were just random happenings in the fleet. The first one’s with the whole Apollo and Starbuck thing, which was actually pretty ok. Except that it makes no sense that Starbuck (a reckless, self-destructive viper pilot with no respect for authority) would think the institution of marriage was so sacred that getting a divorce is unthinkable (no sense other than that the writers needed a reason for her and Apollo’s affair not to work out). That’s another spot where the writers are bending the characters to fit the situation, where, in my humble opinion, it should always be the other way around.

Then there’s the episode with Helo and the Sagittarons. Ehhhhhhh, I don’t like Helo. He’s kind of a whiny little bitch. He’s perpetually upset about something. And whenever I see him and Athena together, it reminds me that it didn’t work out between the Chief and Boomer because Cally shot Boomer (with no repercussions character- or story-wise). Then I remember how much I hate Cally. Then, I remember that Cally and the Tyrol got married, and then I’m blind with rage and need to punt a squirrel. So seeing Helo = punting squirrels. And what was the point of that episode anyway? That discrimination based on religion is bad? Thanks for taking a stand writers. Thanks for taking time away from the overall arc of the series. We really needed that message.

Then comes the episode with Tyrol and Cally in the room with the hull breach while simultaneously Adama is going a little nuts because it’s his wedding anniversary. The episode started out great, showing the increasingly deteriorating relationship between the Chief and Cally (mwa ha ha), but the end was blaaaaah. So they get in one life or death situation and suddenly their marriage is fine? Eat it, marriage counselors. I did like Adama’s story with Apollo. I thought that was nicely handled.

Then the thing with the workers and the striking and the Chief. I actually ended up liking this episode a lot more at the end than I did when it started. The sociological indictment of systemic socio-economic discrimination was really good. And it gives me an excuse to use phrases like “sociological indictment of systemic socio-economic discrimination.” And I love the Chief (even if he was seduced by that she-devil, Cally).

My main beef with all of those episodes is that they contribute nothing to the overall story arc of the season. They’re just little snapshots of the fleet. It made it feel like the season just wandered around at the end with no real place to go. With Baltar’s trial being the centerpiece of the finale, the arc seemed to be everything surrounding New Caprica—which is fine, but it goes back to my first qualm that there should have been more New Caprica. I liked Apollo’s impassioned testimony during the trial (even though it totally abandoned anything like judicial process). I thought it was really well written and delivered (and when we’re talking about Apollo . . . let’s face it, that’s saying something).

And that brings us to the big one. The drama (nuclear) bomb that they dropped on us in the last five minutes of the episode.

*Major spoilin’ in case you didn’t take the first hint*

So Colonel Tigh, Anders, Chief Tyrol, and that Tory chick are allllllll Cylons. Ho-ly shit. And before anyone emails me saying, “But they only think they’re Cylons!” Ronald D. Moore, executive producer and co-creator of the show has explicitly stated in an interview with Rob Owen of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazzette that they are definitely Cylons, although he couched it saying, “They are fundamentally different Cylons.” So they’re Cylons—deal with it. Delicious.

I don’t even know what to think about that. I will say this though: Colonel Tigh, for all his douchebaggery, delivered my second favorite line of the entire series after he realized what he was. “My name is Saul Tigh. I am an officer in the Colonial fleet. Whatever else I am, whatever else it means, that’s the man I want to be. And if I die today, that’s the man I’ll be.” This declaration caused me to literally say, “Fuckin’ a!” at my computer (I don’t have cable—thank you, iTunes). For those who care, my favorite line of the series was delivered by Admiral Adama when asked by Starbuck why he didn’t go through with the murder of Admiral Cain. He said, “It’s not enough to survive. You have to earn it.” Damn straight.

But back to the Cylons. So the Chief is a Cylon, and his wife is a known Cylon killer. They better frakkin’ address that. Then there’s Tigh. Good gravy. Adama’ll love that. Anders and Tory, whatevs. Season four should be interesting.

I’d say the third season was salvaged by an excellent (if annoyingly unresolved) finale. I wish they’d done more with New Caprica and less with their political soapbox, but it’s still Battlestar Galactica and I still love it. The finale actually sparked a burning desire within me to watch all three seasons again from the beginning. Hoowah. Mainly because I want to see if this season was indeed written way differently than the first two, but also because they kick ass. Anywho, hope you enjoyed this thorough display of nerdiness. I had to get it all out. There’s quite a wait until season four starts.

Molon Labe!

Howdy hey, everybody! How you doing? I’m alright, finishing up the school quarter. I saw the movie 300 over the weekend and, well . . . a finer testament to glorious Manliness I have yet to see.

The Scenario: Xerxes I and an army of roughly two million (though those people who call themselves experts disagree on the exact number) are marching into Greece from the north with the intent to either conquer or kill everyone. Oh joy! Who’s the Spartan with a leather speedo bulky enough to stop him? Why, the good King Leonidas of Sparta. Unfortunately, there’s some festival or another . . . something religious (stupid religion) . . . what was that, wikipedia? Oh, yeah—the Carneian festival. Anyway, the priests are like, “no it’s sacred—can’t have an army,” and Leonidas is all, “uh . . . remember the Persians?” and they’re all, “what do we care?” So then Leonidas takes his bad self (after making sweet, sweet love to his wife) and three hundred of his best, most man-elicious warriors (who all have sons to carry on their lines) to go kick some Persian ass.

Ok . . . exposition over? Ass kicking time!

I mean . . . what do you want from this movie? I know what I wanted. I wanted to see a lot of Persians die. And I got what I wanted.

Make no mistake: the movie is horribly historically inaccurate (that’s fun to say). It does not explore the sociological repercussions of basing a society on violence. And it seems to go out of its way at times to mock realism. But, god dammit, it was cool. If I wanted to watch a History Channel special on Thermopylae I would set the VCR and take a nap. I wanted to see people get their heads cut off! I predicted there would be seven decapitations. I was wrong. I forgot that most of the battle was fought with spears. Sadly, there were only four decapitations.

Top Ten Things I Learned from 300:

10. I need a crimson cape
9. Spartan men have muscles that I swear I don’t have
8. If you call yourself an Immortal, you better damn well mean it
7. Be very, very . . . very careful what you say to a Spartan king
6. Slow motion makes anything look cooler
5. There were no unattractive people in ancient Sparta
4. A man should never express his feelings unless it’s with the tip of his . . . spear
3. Spartan women could and would kick my ass
2. If you ally yourself with Xerxes, don’t hide his coins on your person

And finally . . .

1. As a general rule . . . stay out of Sparta

But if you’re in the mood for lots and lots of badassness, look no further.

Tony Jaa!

Hey, everybody. Well, I started grad school this week and the class wasn’t so bad . . . for being Classical Rhetoric. But that’s neither here nor there because Tony Jaa’s back in town!

That’s right. The Muay Thai fightin’, every bone in your body breakin’, makes me wanna cry ’cause I’ll never be that cool martial arts experience has hit America in “The Protector”–the US release of “Tom Yum Goong.” And it’s baaaaaadaaaaaass to see Mr. Tony Jaa ten feet tall.

Seriously, people. If you have even a passing interest in martial arts movies or action flicks, see this movie. But if you’re diabetic, watch out. It may be too freakin’ sweet! Yeah, that’s right. I went there . . .

And, fuck you, Quentin Tarantino. Quit attaching your name to other people’s stuff because you’re too busy humping old conventions and tired cliches to make anything new. I don’t ever want to associate you and Tony Jaa together in my brain.

But that stupid deutschmark aside, I have nothing but good vibes and happy thoughts for this movie. You owe it to yourself to get your world rocked by Mr. Tony Jaa. It’s priceless (unfortunately, the local theatres seem to think it costs around $9 . . . whatevs). You won’t regret it.

Paiyow!

The Tony Jaa Experience

Kee-aye!

Like a Thai cowboy, Tony Jaa runs onto the scene, dispensing brutal justice with his eight limbs. I give you . . . the Tony Jaa Experience.

Tony Jaa is a Thai martial artis actor, choreographer, and all-around badass. What sets him apart from others? A couple of things. 1) no cgi or wire-work. 2) the awesomeness of Muay Thai in a movie industry thoroughly saturated with stock kung fu moves that were old in the 70’s. 3) He makes it hurt. Lately, martial arts fight scenes (really any fight scenes that I’ve seen) look more like dances with fast paced, flowery moves that have no practical application in an real fight. Tony Jaa brings on the hurt. He fights. When he leaps across a room and plants a knee in someone’s face, even the viewer feels it. Eat your heart out, Yuen Wo-Ping. And, certainly, Prachya Pinkaew‘s stylistic camera work helps (I don’t know if you noticed but the first four minutes of that clip were one continuous shot).

I’ve seen two of Tony Jaa’s films, Ong Bak and Tom Yum Goong. Although, in all fairness, the copy of Tom Yum Goong I have doesn’t have English subtitles. Well, ok, it does, but they aren’t the subtitles to that movie. It’s what I get for buying it in Chinatown. However, a good third of the movie is actually in English, so that helps. And, c’mon, you don’t need to know what they’re saying. The basic rundown of the plot of both movies is Tony Jaa is a Thai peasant from a small village, living in relative peace until bad men from the big city ruin his simple life (in Ong Bak, they steal the head of the village Buddha, in Tom Yum Goong they steal two elephants that he grew up with). So he’s got to track ’em down and educate them on how big of a mistake it was. So, yeah, he’s not redefining plot mechanics, but he sure kicks enough ass to make up for it. Each of his movies is filled with ca-razy stunts and mind-blowing fights. Is that Jackie Chan I hear crying in the back? One of my favorite fights is between Tony Jaa and a Capoeira fighter. That fight’s doubly awesome because it involves two martial arts that you never really get to see in movies.

Seriously, if I had enough money, I’d pay a guy to follow him around with a video camera. And then occasionally pay people to attack him. If you have any interest in the martial arts genre, watch these movies! And then buy them, and watch them again. You will love them. I am telling you that you will love them. Why haven’t you watched them yet?!

I leave you with this. Note that getting stabbed only seems to enrage him . . .